Quesnel v. Mussi

​

Quesnel versus Mussi.

THE Defendant being sued by a Capias in this action, Heatly obtained a role to shew cause why the writ should not be quashed, upon proof that the Defendant was a Freeholder.

Ingersol and Du Ponceau supposed the rule, and produced the records of two judgement which had been obtained against the Defendant before a Justice of the Peace &c.

By the Court: This is a sufficient ground to defeat the privilege of a Freeholder.

Let the rule be discharged.

This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.