Portal:Case law of the United States

• See: Portal:United States Supreme Court

• Storage Technology Corp. v. Custom Hardware Engineering & Consulting, Inc., 431 F.3d 134 (Fed. Cir. 2005)
• In re African-American Slave Descendents Litigation, 471 F.3d 754 (7th Cir. 2006), aff'g in part and rev'g in part 375 F. Supp. 2d 721 (N.D. Ill. 2005) (dismissing lawsuits seeking reparations from numerous corporations for their alleged complicity in slavery).

• See: Portal:United States District Courts

• Liliuokalani v. The United States 45 Ct. Claims 418 (1910)

• Erhard Seminars Training v. C.I.R. Docket Nos. 6283-75, 9220-76, 6249-78, 820-79, 4857-80, 1408-81. (1986)
• Est v. C.I.R. Docket Nos. 8043-80, 8998-81. (1986)
• Meyer v. C.I.R. Docket Nos. 6667-78, 10169-78. (1986)
• Erhard v. C. I. R. Docket No. 39473-85, 46712-86, 39532-87, 137-88. (1991)
• Erhard v. C. I. R. Docket Nos. 39473-85, 46712-86, 39532-87, 137-88. (1992)
• Thorne v. C. I. R. Docket Nos. 15467-80, 29911-85. U.S. Tax Ct (1992)
• Erhard v. C. I. R. Docket Nos. 39473-85, 46712-86, 39532-87, 137-88. (1993)
• Erhard v. C.I.R. No. 25656-93. U.S.Tax Ct (1994)
• Kent Hovind, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent (July 6, 2006) Minister Kent Hovind found liable for $500,000 of income tax. Judge dismisses "voluntary tax" claims by petitioner.

• The Hovind Bankruptcy Decision (1996) Minister Kent Hovind unsuccessfully filed for bankruptcy to avoid paying federal income taxes. Hovind was found to have lied about his possessions and income.
• The Riddle Bankruptcy Decision (2006) Chief Judge Emeritus A. Jay Cristol issues an order in a somewhat unusual format.

• In re Adcock, 618 B.R. 260 (Bankr. C.D. Ill 2020). Bank filed fraud and conversion claim against family farmer. Farmer represented by Roy Jackson Dent, III of Dent Law Offices, Ltd., Effingham, Illinois. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18078309068556145189&hl=en&lr=lang_en&as_sdt=400006&as_vis=1&oi=scholaralrt&hist=RvSHED0AAAAJ:4212352831542314795:AAGBfm2zMFZVa22iSwTeWgYN9RRojxGFLA&html=

• In re Pan-American Mfg. Co., Inc. (1929) Federal Trade Commission prevents Grapico founding line from using the "Grapico" name in trade.

See Atlantic Reporter for select opinions of state supreme courts and lower appellate courts from Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

See: Portal:Arkansas case law

• Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. 24 Cal.2d 453 (1944)
• Drennan v. Star Paving Co., 51 Cal.2d 409 (1958)
• Greenman v. Yuba Power Products 59 Cal.2d 57 (1963)
• People v. De Santiago 71 Cal. 2d 18 (1969)

See: Portal:Delaware case law

• Hewitt v. Hewitt 77 Ill. 2d 49, 394 N.E.2d 1204 (1979)
• People v. King 2019 IL 123926 (2019)

• Morrison v. White, 16 La. Ann. 100 (1861)

• Commonwealth v. Kneeland, 20 Pick. 206, 37 Mass. 206 (1838)

• Nebraska v. Verma J. Harrison (1999)
• State v. Assad (2020)

See: Portal:New Jersey case law

• MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916)
• Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928)
• Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co., 26 N.Y.2d 219 (1970)

See: Portal:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

• Lucy v. Zehmer, 196 Va. 493; 84 S.E.2d 516 (1954)

See: Portal:Arkansas case law

• Wollersheim v. Church of Scientology, 212 Cal.App.3d 872, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 1989)
• Church of Scientology v. Armstrong, 232 Cal.App.3d 1060, 283 Cal.Rptr. 917 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 1991)
• Church of Scientology v. Wollersheim, 42 Cal.App.4th 628, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 620 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 1996)
• Church of Scientology International v. Superior Court, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d (Cal.App. 1 Dist. 2005)

See: Portal:New Jersey case law

• City of Dallas v. England, No 3-92-243-CV. Feb. 10, 1993
• Comptroller of Public Accounts v. Ethical Society of Austin, No. 03-02-00066-CV

• State of Arizona v. James Arthur Ray, Case No. V1300CR201080049, Defendant James Arthur Ray's Response to State's Motion in Limine re: Witness Rick Ross (2011)

• The People of the State of California vs Sylvia Celeste Brown and Kensil Dalzell Brown (1993)
• The People of the State of California v. Joel Robert Tobias (2001)

See: Portal:Delaware case law

• Price v. Philip Morris, Inc. (2003)

• Testimony of William P. Peniston and Adam Black (1838)

See: Portal:New Jersey case law

• Rutgers v. Waddington (1784)
• New York v. Joseph Smith (1826)
• Mayor of Hudson v. Thorne, 7 Paige Ch. 261 (1838)

• Gerard v. Basse, 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 119 (Phila. Cty. Com. Pl. 1784)
• Hunter’s Lessee v. Kennedy, 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 81 (Phila. Cty. Com. Pl. 1784)
• Gerard v. La Coste, 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 194 (Phila. Cty. Com. Pl. 1787)
• Keely v. Ord, 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 310 (Phila. Cty. Com. Pl. 1788)
• Graff v. Smith’s Admors., 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 481 (Phila. Cty. Com. Pl. 1789)
• Haimes v. Temple University Hospital, 39 Pa. D. & C.3d 381 (1986)

• Portal:United States
• Portal:Case law
• Portal:United States copyright case law‎
• Portal:Supreme Court of the United States
• Portal:United States District Courts
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
• Portal:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit