Page:The New Protectionism.djvu/112
tion living in the country, where the birthrate remains higher and the infantile mortality lower than in the towns, and where, in spite of a selective drawing of the best stock into towns, the general standard of health and longevity is higher. These general criticisms have, however, been greatly reinforced by considerations of national defence. Larger families born and bred in the country are wanted for cannon food. And the degree of our dependence upon overseas supply of food is now more than ever realized as a national danger.
It is natural, therefore, that various proposals for stimulating agriculture, keeping population on the soil, and improving the conditions of life in our villages, should be to the fore. This is no place for a general discussion of the merits of this branch of "social reform." It must suffice to note the part Protectionism is likely to play in it.
By character and tradition the landowners and farmers of this country, as of many