Page:The Journal of geology (IA journalofgeology11893univers).pdf/323

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
REVIEWS.
745
Text-book of Comparative Geology.By E. Kayser, Ph.D.Translated and edited by Philip Lake.Pp. xii, 426.Swan, Sonnenschein & Co., London.(Macmillan).

The translation of Dr. Kayser's book is a welcome addition to the literature of geology in English. Its title is fairly definitive. It is an attempt to bring together, or to set in their proper relations, the results of geological investigation conducted in the various parts of the world. The volume is too brief to allow this to be carried out in great detail. The abbreviation has been effected in part by the omission, or by no more than the merest mention, of results reached in extra-European countries. This is particularly true with that part of the volume which deals with the post-Paleozoic formations. While at first thought this might seem to detract from the value of the volume for American students, we think on the whole it is an advantage instead, if omissions were necessary. Data concerning American geology are more easily accessible to American students than data concerning European geology, which this volume measurably supplies. The volume will find its chief use in America as a convenient reference book of European geology, and as such it should be widely distributed. Its abundance of tables, showing the relations of the subdivisions of the various systems in different countries, so far as they are made out, are especially convenient for general reference.

At several points in the volume there is a noticeable tendency to make unqualified statements where qualified statements would seem to us better. A case in point is the unqualified denial of the organic character of the Eozoon. It is true in most cases, where positive conclusions are asserted, that they represent the best conclusions of the present day, but in some cases they seem to us to represent probable or qualified or tentative conclusions, not demonstrated or absolute or final ones.

All pre-Cambrian rocks are represented as Archean, though the length of Archean time is stated to be so great that the beginning of the Cambrian "may be considered as comparatively a recent event." In spite of this recognition of the importance of the Archean, but fourteen pages are devoted to its consideration. Although different systems are not recognized in the pre-Cambrian rocks, the diversity of origin of different parts of the group is distinctly recognized. The author is inclined to attach less weight to the existence of limestone and graphite in the Archean rocks, as indications of life, than would