Page:The Journal of geology (IA journalofgeology11893univers).pdf/269

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
THE BASIC MASSIVE ROCKS, ETC.
695

to the Animikie and the Keweenawan rocks. Some of the rocks, called by Winchell Pewabic quartzite, are probably true Animikie fragmentals, or metamorphosed phases of these, but even in this case there is no proof that the gabbro immediately succeeds them in point of age. The evidence would simply indicate that the eruptive is younger than the Animikie. It would not fix its age more definitely. The observations of Winchell would thus seem to lead to the same conclusion as that reached by Irving in so far as the latter supposed the gabbro to be post-Huronian.

Upon returning again to the problem as to the age of the gabbro Winchell[1] attempts to fix this more definitely by assuming the identity of this rock with the anorthosite, which is shown by Lawson to be older than the bedded Keweenawan. But it is impossible at present to assert with any degree of certainty, that the two rocks are the same (although VanHise holds with Winchell that their equivalency is possible), for the one has not been traced into the other, nor has the upper limit of the gabbro been carefully studied. This great mass may be much older than the lowermost beds of the Keweenawan series, but as yet there has been cited no proof in favor of the view.

So far as the little evidence at hand enables us to judge, the gabbro whose petrographical characteristics are discussed in this article, forms a great mass of enormous extent above the Animikie but below the interbedded flows and fragmentals of the Keweenawan series in Minnesota. There are obscure indications that the mass is a great layer composed of successive flows that followed one another so rapidly as to give no opportunity for the action of erosion processes or for deposition between them. If this be so the lack of more apparent bedding is doubtless due to the great thickness of the individual beds, as is also their coarse grain. There are some things about the mass, however, that suggest another origin for it. "The great coarseness of grain, the perfection of the crystallization, the abrupt termination of the belts, the complete want of structure, and the presence of intersecting areas of crystalline granitoid rocks—all suggest the

  1. Bull. No. 8.Geol. and Nat. Hist. Survey of Minn. p. xviii.