Page:The Journal of geology (IA journalofgeology11893univers).pdf/259
of coal exclusive of slate and other partings, but those for the Bituminous areas include the slates and other partings, so that the actual amount of coal is less than the figures indicate. It is sufficiently clear that the conditions favoring the accumulation of coal in beds continued longer without interruption in the anthracite region than they did elsewhere within the Appalachian basin; for the contrast is equally marked, when the anthracite region is compared with the Virginias or Kentucky further southwestward. The process of conversion also continued longer without interruption, as the chemical analyses show.[1] This, in the Anthracite Strip, one finds:
| Cumberland Field (only the Pittsburgh), | 4.47- | 4.78 | Coal, 13' |
| Broad Top Field, | 3.26- | 4.64 | Coal, 14' |
| Southern Anthracite Field, | |||
| Southern prong, | 4.36- | 12.40 | Coal, 18'-30' |
| Main Field, | 11.64- | 23.27 | Coal, 30'-60' |
| Western Middle Field, | 19.87- | 24 | Coal, 40'-58' |
| Eastern Middle Field, | 25.53- | 30.35 | Coal, 52'-53' |
| Northern Field, | 19.37- | 19.92 | Coal, 44'-53' |
The anthracite analyses are commercial, samples chosen from carload lots. Very much higher ratios are obtained by sampling single benches.
The First and Second Bituminous basins show a similar change along the line of trend, the amount of volatile decreasing northwardly as one approaches the old shore line.[2] Thus, in the First, the Clarion coal bed shows from 2.94 to 4.84 near the Maryland line, but from 7.07 to 10.28 in Sullivan county, where is its last exposure at the north. In the Second basin, the Upper Freeport coal shows 2.26 to 2.85 near the Maryland border, but 3.96 to 4.48 at the last northerly exposure, in Lycoming county. The variations in the Third and other basins are less, as one
- ↑ The figures here given are the ratios between the Fixed Carbon and the Volatile Combustible, the ash and water being ignored; the more volatile, the smaller the ratio.
- ↑ Some curious variations, apparently contradictory of the statement here made, occur in the analyses. These will be discussed and their interest shown by the writer in a review of theories respecting the origin of coal beds, which is now in course of preparation.