Page:The Journal of geology (IA journalofgeology11893univers).pdf/253

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
ORIGIN OF THE PENNSYLVANIA ANTHRACITE.
679

as at the north, to the general elevation of the synclines and their passage into the New York plateau.

Analyses of coal samples, taken from the Pittsburgh bed in the several basins, show a progressive decrease in the proportion of volatile, combustible matter toward the east or southeast, a fact which early attracted the attention of H. D. Rogers, and which has possessed much interest for geologists ever since. Analyses made for the Second Pennsylvania Survey prove the same condition in the lower coals. Mr. Winslow's studies of the Arkansas coals show a similar tendency to decrease in the same direction; and Murchison discovered a like condition in the Donetz anthracite field of southern Russia.

H. D. Rogers,[1] in 1842, announced to the Association of American Geologists the law of gradation, as he understood it, which involves "a progressive increase in the proportion of the volatile matter, passing from a nearly total deficiency of it in the driest anthracites to an ample abundance in the richest caking coal." Finding, as he believed, that the volatile matter in the coal augments westwardly, precisely as the flexures diminish, he attributed the variation to the influence of steam and other intensely heated gases escaping through crevices necessarily produced during the permanent bending of the strata. Under such conditions, the coal throughout the eastern basins, the more disturbed, would discharge more or less of the volatile constituents during the violent earthquake action, whereas the more western beds, less disturbed, would be less debituminized.

J. J. Stevenson,[2] in 1877, showed that the variations in volatile exhibited by the Pittsburgh coal bed along the southeast and northwest line bear no relation whatever to increase or decrease of stratigraphical disturbance, and suggested that the variations are due to difference of conditions under which the coal was formed.

  1. Rogers: Reps. of the 1st, 2d and 3rd meetings of the Association of American Geologists and Naturalists.1843, pp. 470 et seq.
  2. Stevenson: 2d Geol. Surv. of Penn., Rep. of Progress on the Fayette and Westmoreland Dist.Pt. I. pp. 61, et seq.