Page:The Journal of geology (IA journalofgeology11893univers).pdf/225

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
GEOLOGIC TIME.
651

mechanical sediments of a uniform character clearly shows this to have been the case, especially in pre-Silurian (Ordovician) time. The present known distribution of the mechanical sediments indicate that they were mainly brought into the sea from the west,[1] although a vast amount was derived from the land on the eastern side in pre-Ordovician time. They were quite evenly distributed over the sea bed, except where local accumulations of silt and sand occurred near the larger sources of supply, or in the direction of powerful currents within the sea.

The conditions of the deposition of the carbonate of lime are less clearly understood than those governing mechanical sediments, and I shall enter upon the discussion of them at considerable length. There are three methods by which it usually is considered that it may be deposited: 1. Agency of organisms; 2. Chemical precipitation; 3. By mechanical methods.

It is the general opinion of geologists that limestone rocks are the result almost entirely of the consolidation of lime removed from the sea water through the agency of life, and that they consist of the remains of foraminifera, crinoids, corals, etc., or their fragments, embedded in a more or less crystalline matrix resulting from subsequent alteration of the original deposits. This, however, has been seriously questioned. Sorby, in giving his general conclusions of an extensive microscopic examination of limestones, states that:

Even if it were possible to study in a detached state the finer granular particles which constitute so large a part of many limestone formations, it would usually be impossible to say whether they had been derived from organisms which can decay down into granules, or from other organisms which can only be worn down into granules, or from ground-down older limestone, or, in some cases, from carbonate of lime deposited chemically as granules.....The shape and character of the identifiable fragments do, indeed, prove that much of this must have been derived from the decayed and worn-down calcareous organisms;

  1. Geol. Expl. Fortieth Parallel, Vol. I., 1878, p. 247.