Page:The Journal of geology (IA journalofgeology11893univers).pdf/197

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
EDITORIAL.
623

to submerged channels in the south-eastern part of the continent, particularly the Antillean region, and urged these as evidences of very great subsidence. The paper awakened considerable discussion, the general tenor of which was the acceptance of the evidence and of the inference of subsidence, with an expression of doubt as to the time of its occurrence and its relations to other geological events.

The paper of Mr. Upham was a fuller statement of the arguments he has recently advanced in support of the derivation of kames, eskers, and moraines chiefly from englacial drift. These, and his views of the internal movement of the ice upon which they are in some degree founded, were opposed by Reid on physical grounds and by others on observational grounds. It was remarked that existing glaciers fail to show basally-rubbed material on their surfaces, even on their low terminal slopes, at least as a common fact. In his second paper, Mr. Upham urged a somewhat simple and brief succession of Pleistocene formations. The successive lines of moraines and the observed overlaps of till were interpreted as signifying minor and relatively brief halts and readvances of the ice. In the discussion, this position was opposed as being inconsonant with the evidences of interglacial intervals and of intervening erosions, oxidations and other changes which the formations were thought to present.

The papers of Darton and Holmes on different but analogous portions of the coastal region showed the very great advances which have been made in the last few years in the analysis and differentiation of the coastal formations, and the interesting discussions they called forth showed, in some measure, the important bearing these have upon the interpretation of the Pleistocene and immediately Pre-Pleistocene histories of the glaciated region.

Professor W. P. Blake, while coinciding in general in the views held by Whitney and by Chamberlin respecting lead and zinc deposits, urged the existence of a greater amount of dislocation than they had recognized, and attributed to it greater influence in the localization of the deposits. His views are intermediate