Page:The Journal of geology (IA journalofgeology11893univers).pdf/142

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
568
THE JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY.

viz., that of circumferential contraction and that of radial descent, intersect, is the level of no strain.

Now laborious calculations have been made by Davison, Darwin and Fisher to determine the depth of this level of no strain. All make it very superficial. Davison, taking an initial temperature of 7000° F., makes it five miles below the surface. Fisher, on the same data, only two miles, and with an initial temperature of 4000° only 0.7 of a mile. It is easy to see that if this be true, the amount of lateral thrust must be small indeed.

Now undoubtedly there is a true principle here which must not hereafter be neglected, but is almost needless to say that these quantitative results are in the last degree uncertain. The calculations are, of course, based on certain premises. These are a uniform initial temperature of say 7000° F., a time of cooling, say 100 or 200 millions of years, and a certain rate of cooling under assumed conditions. The depth of the level of no strain increases with the time and is still going downward. In a word, in a question so complex both mathematically and physically and in which the data are so very uncertain, every cautious geologist, while freely admitting the soundness of the principle, will withhold assent to the conclusions. Huxley has reminded us that the mathematical mill, though a very good mill, cannot make wholesome flour without good wheat. It grinds indifferently whatever is fed to it. It has been known to grind peas cods ere now. It may be doing so again in this case. Let us wait.

But besides withholding assent and waiting for more light, I may add that these calculations, of course, go on the supposition that the whole contraction of the earth is due to loss of heat; but as we have already said, it may be due also to loss of constituent water. This would put an entirely different aspect on the subject.

ALTERNATIVE PHYSICAL THEORIES.

I have given the objections to the contractional theory frankly and I think fairly. They are undoubtedly serious. Let us see what has been offered it its place.