Page:The Journal of geology (IA journalofgeology11893univers).pdf/129

This page has been validated.
ORIGIN OF MOUNTAIN RANGES.
555

cause of mountains justifies the digression, if such it may be called.

Inferences from 3 and 4, Folding and Cleavage.—Still adhering closely to observed facts, there are some necessary inferences from folded structure and cleavage. These structures are indisputable proofs that mountain strata have been subjected to enormous lateral pressure at right angles to the trend of the axis, by which the whole mass has been mashed together horizontally. But such horizontal mashing must of necessity produce corresponding up-swelling along the line of yielding. In a word, it is evident that mountains have been uplifted largely, at least, if not wholly, by horizontal mashing. The only question that remains is, Is lateral mashing alone sufficient to produce the highest mountains? Let us see.

The amount of uplift in such cases would depend on two things, viz., the thickness of the strata and the amount of mashing. Now, as already shown, mountain sediments are 30,000, 40,000 and even 50,000 feet thick. The amount of mashing in many mountains is almost incredible. In the Appalachian it is so extreme that in one place, according to Claypole, ninety-six miles of the original sediments have been crowded into sixteen miles, and the shortening of the whole Appalachian breadth is estimated as eighty-eight miles.[1] In the Alps the shortening is estimated by Heim at seventy-two miles or one-half the original breadth of the sediments.[2] In a word, we may without exaggeration say that, in great mountains, the original space is to the folded space as two to one, or even three to one. Now a crushing of 30,000 feet of sediments into one-half their original space would double their thickness, which is equivalent to a clear elevation of 30,000 feet. But strata are 40,000 and even 50,000 feet thick. Evidently then this method alone is sufficient to account for the highest mountains in the world, even allowing for the enormous erosion which they have suffered.

The same is equally shown by the phenomena of slaty cleav-

  1. Amn. Natst. Vol. 19, p. 257.
  2. Heim: Archives des Sciences, Vol. 64, p. 120, 1878.