Page:The Journal of geology (IA journalofgeology11893univ).pdf/382

ant difference in the modes of deposition of iron and manganese, which also will be mentioned again.

It will thus be seen that while some of the forms in which iron and manganese are deposited are the same, others differ very widely, and even similar forms are often deposited under different conditions. It is doubtless to these various forms and conditions of deposition that the alternate association and separation of iron and manganese in nature are due.

The very frequent intimate association of iron and manganese in sedimentary rocks is what would be expected from a deposition as oxide or carbonate in basins such as coastal lagoons or bogs, where the waters moved very slowly, or not at all, for under such conditions, they are often deposited together.^[1] Moreover, it is a well-known fact that isomorphous substances have a strong tendency to combine in a homogeneous mass, and to crystallize together in different proportions. Carbonate of iron and of manganese are isomorphous with each other, and this is hence a possible cause of the frequent intimacy of their association, such as is seen in almost all manganiferous spathic iron ores, whether these ores are formed by direct precipitation or by replacement of carbonate of lime. The oxidation of such a mixture would give the common form of an intimately combined iron and manganese ore.

Since there is usually more iron than manganese in the rocks from which both metals were originally derived, the surface waters draining from areas of such rocks usually contain the metals in a similar proportion. Hence, in cases where the deposition of the carbonates of both occurs at the same spot, the isomorphous carbonates derived from the solutions have a larger percentage of carbonate of iron than of carbonate of manganese, and the resulting oxides contain the two metals in the same