Page:The Civil code of Japan (IA cu31924069576704).pdf/329

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

— 309 —

the facts forming the cause of such acquisition or loss are completed.

11.

The existence and the effect of an obligation arising from business management,[1] unjust enrichment or a wrongful act are governed by the law of the place where the facts forming the cause of such obligation come into existence.

The foregoing provisions as to wrongful acts do not apply to facts which came into existence in a foreign country but are not wrongful according to Japanese law.

Even though facts arising in a foreign country are wrongful according to Japanese law, the injured party cannot claim damages or remedies other than those allowed by Japanese law.

12.

The effect as to third persons of the transfer of an obligation is governed by the law of the domicile of the debtor.

13.

The requisites of a marriage are governed as to each party by the law of his or her nationality. As to its forms, however, the law of the country where it is celebrated governs.

The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not affect the application of Art. 777 of the Civil Code.

  1. ↑ Negotiorum gestio. See Civil Code, Art. 697 et seq.
This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.