Page:Sewell Dikshit The Indian Calendar (1896) proc.djvu/115
| d. | w. | a. | b. | c. | |
| Already obtained | 315 | 3 | 9902 | 302 | 921 |
| Subtract value for two days (Table IV.) | 2 | 2 | 677 | 73 | 5 |
| 313 | 1 | 9225 | 229 | 916 | |
| Equation for () (229) (Table VI.) | 279 | ||||
| Equation forDo. () (916) (Do. VII.) | 91 | ||||
| 1 | 9595 | . | |||
This index gives us kṛishṇa 14th (Table VIII.) as current at sunrise on Sunday (1). The tithi ended and kṛi. 30 commenced (9667 − 9595 = 72 =) 5 h. 6 m. after sunrise on Sunday. This kṛi. 30 therefore can be connected with a Sunday, and if the nakshatra comes right—Hasta—then this would be the given date. We calculate the nakshatra at sunrise on Sunday.
| t. | c. | ||||
| As calculated above | 9595 | 916 | |||
| () multiplied by 10 | 916 | × 10 = | 9160 | ||
| Add constant | 7207 | ||||
| 6367 | |||||
| Subtract the equation for () (786) (Table VII.) | 91 | ||||
| Add () to () | 6276 | 6276 | |||
| 5871 | |||||
This index () gives nakshatra No. 16 Visâkhâ (Table VIII., col. 6, 7, 8). Therefore No. 13 Hasta had already passed, and this proves that the date obtained above is incorrect. Now if Kârttika in the given record be pûrṇimânta, the amânta month corresponding (Table II., Part i) would be Asvina, the 7th month, and it is possible that Âśvina kṛi. 30, falling back as it does 29 or 30 days from the date calculated, might fall on a Sunday. Let us see if it did so.
| d. | w. | a. | b. | c. | |
| Chaitra śukla 1, Śaka 667 current (as above) | 80 | 6 | 324 | 773 | 278 |
| 180 (6 expired months) + 15 (śukla) + 14 (see above) = 209 tithis = 206 days | 206 | 3 | 9758 | 476 | 564 |
| 286 | 2 | 82 | 249 | 842 | |
| Equation for () (249) (Table VI.) | 280 | ||||
| Equation forDo. () (842) (Table VII.) | 111 | ||||
| 2 | 473 | ||||
The result gives us Monday, śukla 2nd. [1]
- ↑ Note that this approximate calculation, which is the same as that by method B, comes out actually wrong by two days.