Page:Midland naturalist (IA midlandnaturalis01lond).pdf/336
longer speak of the genera Distoma, Tristoma, Polystoma, Selerostoma, and so forth; but, following Diesing, they prefer to convert the final Greek component into a true Latin syllable. Thus we have Distomum, Polystomum, Sclerostomum, and the like. Long habit has so fully familiarised us with the old plan of retaining the Greek termination unaltered, that I confess to some reluctance in parting with the final component (stoma) although the form is not strictly classical. On the other hand, the introduction of new and more striking departures from the legitimate method of employing the binomial nomenclature is much to be deprecated. Such a barbarism as Hyperbodon butzkopf, for example—intolerable as it must sound to the scholar's ear—is, nevertheless, freely accepted by well-known Naturalists both at home and abroad. In helminthology there are probably fewer glaring errors of nomenclature than occur in other departments of Natural History science. Nevertheless, I think Mr. Grove's criticism in the matter of the family term Distomidæ perfectly just.[1] Following the practice of the late Edward Forbes and others, I have frequently, and as I think fittingly, employed the names of savans for the purpose of forming new genera and species. Thus, by almost universal consent (on the Continent, at least) my genus Bilharzia has been adopted: its general acceptance being in part due, no doubt, to the fact that, as a generic term, it had priority over the various other titles severally proposed by Diesing, Weinland, and Moquin-Tandon.
Nematoda Continued.
28.—Filaria lentis, Diesing.
20.—Filaria labialis, Pane.
30—Fileria hominis oris, Leidy.
- ↑ See the "Midland Naturalist" for May, p. 123.