Page:Kilmer-Abrego-Garcia-Documents.pdf/7

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
A201-577-119

We adopt and affirm the Immigration Judge’s danger ruling (IJ at 2–3). See Matter of Burbano, 20 I&N Dec. 872, 874 (BIA 1994). Notwithstanding the respondent’s challenges to the reliability of the GFIS, the Immigration Judge appropriately considered allegations of gang affiliation against the respondent in determining that he has not demonstrated that he is not a danger to property or persons. See Matter of Fatahi, 26 I&N Dec. at 795 (in determining whether an alien presents a danger to the community and thus should not be released on bond pending removal proceedings, an Immigration Judge should consider both direct and circumstantial evidence of dangerousness); Matter of Guerra, 24 I&N Dec. 37, 40 (BIA 2006) (stating that Immigration Judges may look to a number of factors in determining whether an alien merits release on bond, including “the alien’s criminal record, including the extensiveness of criminal activity, the recency of such activity, and the seriousness of the offenses”).

Consequently, we need not address the Immigration Judge’s flight risk determination (Respondent’s Br. at 10–11).

Accordingly, the following order is entered.

Order: The appeal is dismissed.

 

2

This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.