Page:Japan by the Japanese (1904).djvu/259

tion. In consequence of the war between Japan and China it has come to pass that whereas the expression ‘Eastern Question’ used to apply only to the world-famed problem of Eastern Europe, it now possesses the dual significance of the Near-Eastern, or the Far-Eastern, Question. In a word, the sphere of foreign intercourse has so greatly widened that the slightest incident may affect the interests of the whole world.

I desire here to emphasize the facts that foreign intercourse must above all things be planned on a large scale, for all diplomatic projects have immediate interest for the whole world; and that, since foreign policy, or, rather, national policy, must be fixed, unchanged, and continuous, the best method of diplomacy is to adhere strictly to the principles of international law. Now, to adhere to the principles of international law, diplomacy must be based on justice. The power of justice is great, for it is sure to enlist the sympathy of the whole world. Having devoted herself for years with ardour and diligence to national progress, and having come to enjoy the great friendship of the Powers of Europe and America, Japan, which for forty years past has been fettered with disadvantageous treaties, has now advanced to such a position that, in accordance with the principles of international law, she is recognised as a truly independent Power, and, in conformity with international usage, is accorded the treatment of an equal. This is, in fact, the result of her own progress, and of England’s consent, leading the rest of the world, to a revision of the existing treaties—consent which was followed by a similar ample expression of good-will and agreement in treaty revision by the other Powers of Europe and America. Thus treaty revision, which has for decades been a great object with us, has been accomplished, the only Power that has not yet effected revision being Austro-Hungary, and the negotiations with her are sure sooner or later to be successfully concluded. Japan will thus have attained a position of equality with the world.

It has hitherto been contended, as you are aware, even by great jurists, that extraterritoriality should be exercised in all non-Christian countries, and among all other than white races. But that theory has gradually been abandoned, and Japan, having based her progress upon justice, and received the just support of the world, has, though outside the pale of Christendom and the white races, succeeded in attaining a position of equality with them. If, therefore, we would reap all the fruits of treaty revision, we must make still greater efforts to develop our country. There is no doubt that the country will progress, and its advance will go hand-in-hand with diplomacy. We must adopt that best type of diplomacy which, based on justice,