Page:Humanism; philosophical essays (IA cu31924029012171).pdf/142
The readers of Mr. Ritchie's papers will have learnt by this time that they may expect to be entertained with a clear account of his views, neatly phrased and intelligibly presented, and not disdainful of an occasional touch of humour. And in these respects they will have not been disappointed by his brilliant disquisition on—What is reality?—in the May number of the Philosophical Review. But if they sought fresh light on one of the most puzzling and fundamental of philosophic problems, it is to be feared that they were not equally well satisfied. Mr. Ritchie's paper is polemical rather than investigatory, and he seems more concerned to make dialectical points against his adversaries than to probe his subject to the bottom. And as his adversaries' views are very various, and often have little in common but their disagreement
- ↑ From the Philosophical Review of September 1892. The late Professor D. G. Ritchie, whose premature demise 1, in common with all his pupils, have not ceased to deplore, reprinted the article to which this is a reply in a volume of essays entitled Darwin and Hegel (1893). pp. 77-108.
110