Page:History of Early Iran.pdf/102

an Akkadian inscription in which he employs merely the title "king," dedicated a temple to "Inshushinak, the king of the gods," an epithet wrongly interpreted in our own day to obtain the name of a sovereign, "Inshushinak-shar-ilani."^[1] When Tan-Uli became sukkalmah (ca. 1780-1771), Temti-halki was elevated to the office of sukkal of Elam and Simash according to the usual scheme, and Kuk-Nashur II became the new ruler in Susa.^[2] Owing to an error of the Elamite antiquarians, this Kuk-Nashur was confused with the first of the name, and in memory of his supposed deeds several bricks were inscribed in the twelfth century B.C. Today we may correct the mistake and distinguish the individuals without too great condemnation of the later scribes.

Unfortunately, we have no data on Tan-Uli; but when Temti-halki in turn became sukkalmah, he, like others before him, rejoiced in the full titulary when he dedicated a temple to the chief deity of Susa. Again writing in Akkadian, he tells us that, like Kuk-Nashur I, he was a "son of a sister of Shilhaha."^[3] Though eventually his titulary was forgotten, his

1. ↑ Scheil, Mém., II, 120.
2. ↑ Tan-Uli, sukkalmah over Temti-halki: Mém., Vol. XXII, Nos. 7 and 9; Vol. XXIII, No. 173; Vol. XXIV, Nos. 338 and 353. Tan-Uli over Kuk-Nashur: Mém., Vol. XXII, No. 102; Vol. XXIII, No. 178. In Vol. XXIII, No. 206, Tan-Uli is called the sukkal over Kuk-Nashur; this too is not explainable at present. Temti-halki, sukkal over Kuk-Nashur: Mém., Vol. XXIII, Nos. 208 f.; cf. also Vol. XXII, No. 85.
3. ↑ Mém., II, 77 f.; cf. SAK, pp. 184 f. Temti-halki bears the curious title "sukkalmah of Elam and Simash" in the text of Mém., VI, 27; cf. SAK, loc. cit. Doubtless this is an oversight of the scribe.