Page:EB1911 - Volume 06.djvu/880
uniform cross-section of which the length is known, and if the density of the substance is then measured, the volume-resistivity can be immediately calculated.
If R is the resistance in ohms of a wire of length π, uniform cross-section s, and density d, then taking Ο for the volume-resistivity we have 109RοΌΟπ/s; but πsdοΌM, where M is the mass of the wire. Hence 109RοΌΟdπ2/M. If ποΌ100 and MοΌ1, then RοΌΟβ²οΌresistivity in ohms per metre-gramme, and 109Οβ²οΌ10,000dΟ, or ΟοΌ105Οβ²/d, and Οβ²οΌ10,000MR/π2.
The following rules, therefore, are useful in connexion with these measurements. To obtain the mass-resistivity per metre-gramme of a substance in the form of a uniform metallic wire:βMultiply together 10,000 times the mass in grammes and the total resistance in ohms, and then divide by the square of the length in centimetres. Again, to obtain the volume-resistivity in C.G.S. units per centimetre-cube, the rule is to multiply the mass-resistivity in ohms by 100,000 and divide by the density. These rules, of course, apply only to wires of uniform cross-section. In the following Tables I., II. and III. are given the mass and volume resistivity of ordinary metals and certain alloys expressed in terms of the international ohm or the absolute C.G.S. unit of resistance, the values being calculated from the experiments of A. Matthiessen (1831β1870) between 1860 and 1865, and from later results obtained by J. A. Fleming and Sir James Dewar in 1893.
Table I.βElectric Mass-Resistivity of Various Metals at 0Β° C., or
Resistance per Metre-gramme in International Ohms at 0Β° C. (Matthiessen.)
| Metal. | Resistance at 0Β° C. in International Ohms of a Wire 1 Metre long and Weighing 1 Gramme. |
Approximate Temperature Coefficient near 20Β° C. |
| Silver (annealed) | Β·1523βββ | 0Β·00377 |
| Silver (hard-drawn) | Β·1657βββ | . . |
| Copper (annealed) | Β·1421βββ | 0Β·00388 |
| Copper (hard-drawn) | Β·1449 (Matthiessenβs | Standard) |
| Gold (annealed) | Β·4025βββ | 0Β·00365 |
| Gold (hard-drawn) | Β·4094βββ | . . |
| Aluminium (annealed)β | Β·0757βββ | . . |
| Zinc (pressed) | Β·4013βββ | . . |
| Platinum (annealed) | 1Β·9337βββ | . . |
| Iron (annealed) | Β·765ββββ | . . |
| Nickel (annealed) | 1Β·058[1]ββ β | . . |
| Tin (pressed) | Β·9618βββ | 0Β·00365 |
| Lead (pressed) | 2Β·2268βββ | 0Β·00387 |
| Antimony (pressed) | 2Β·3787βββ | 0Β·00389 |
| Bismuth (pressed) | 12Β·8554[1] | 0Β·00354 |
| Mercury (liquid) | 12Β·885[2] | 0Β·00072 |
The data commonly used for calculating metallic resistivities were obtained by A. Matthiessen, and his results are set out in the Table II. which is taken from Cantor lectures given by Fleeming Jenkin in 1866 at or about the date when the researches were made. The figures given by Jenkin have, however, been reduced to international ohms and C.G.S. units by multiplying by (Ο/4)β0Β·9866β 105οΌ77,485.
Subsequently numerous determinations of the resistivity of various pure metals were made by Fleming and Dewar, whose results are set out in Table III.
Table II.βElectric Volume-Resistivity of Various Metals at 0Β° C.,
or Resistance per Centimetre-cube in C.G.S. Units at 0Β° C.
| Metal. | Volume-Resistivity. at 0Β° C. in C.G.S. Units |
| Silver (annealed) | 1,502ββ |
| Silver (hard-drawn) | 1,629ββ |
| Copper (annealed) | 1,594ββ |
| Copper (hard-drawn) | 1,630[3] |
| Gold (annealed) | 2,052ββ |
| Gold (hard-drawn) | 2,090ββ |
| Aluminium (annealed)β | 3,006ββ |
| Zinc (pressed) | 5,621ββ |
| Platinum (annealed) | 9,035ββ |
| Iron (annealed) | 10,568ββ |
| Nickel (annealed) | 12,429[4] |
| Tin (pressed) | 13,178ββ |
| Lead (pressed) | 19,580ββ |
| Antimony (pressed) | 35,418ββ |
| Bismuth (pressed) | 130,872ββ |
| Mercury (liquid) | 94,896[5] |
Resistivity of Mercury.βThe volume-resistivity of pure mercury is a very important electric constant, and since 1880 many of the most competent experimentalists have directed their attention to the determination of its value. The experimental process has usually been to fill a glass tube of known dimensions, having large cup-like extensions at the ends, with pure mercury, and determine the absolute resistance of this column of metal. For the practical details of this method the following references may be consulted:ββThe Specific Resistance of Mercury,β Lord Rayleigh and Mrs Sidgwick, Phil. Trans., 1883, part i. p. 173, and R. T. Glazebrook, Phil. Mag., 1885, p. 20; βOn the Specific Resistance of Mercury,β R. T. Glazebrook and T. C. Fitzpatrick, Phil. Trans., 1888, p. 179, or Proc. Roy. Soc., 1888, p. 44, or Electrician, 1888, 21, p. 538; βRecent Determinations of the Absolute Resistance of Mercury,β R. T. Glazebrook, Electrician, 1890, 25, pp. 543 and 588. Also see J. V. Jones, βOn the Determination of the Specific Resistance of Mercury in Absolute Measure,β Phil. Trans., 1891, A, p. 2. Table IV. gives the values of the volume-resistivity of mercury as determined by various observers, the constant being expressed (a) in terms of the resistance in ohms of a column of mercury one millimetre in cross-section and 100 centimetres in length, taken at 0Β° C.; and (b) in terms of the length in centimetres of a column of mercury one square millimetre in cross-section taken at 0Β° C. The result of all the most careful determinations has been to show that the resistivity of pure mercury at 0Β° C. is about 94,070 C.G.S. electromagnetic units of resistance, and that a column of mercury 106Β·3 centimetres in length having a cross-sectional area of one square millimetre would have a resistance at 0Β° C. of one international ohm. These values have accordingly been accepted as the official and recognized values for the specific resistance of mercury, and the definition of the ohm. The table also states the methods which have been adopted by the different observers for obtaining the absolute value of the resistance of a known column of mercury, or of a resistance coil afterwards compared with a known column of mercury. A column of figures is added showing the value in fractions of an international ohm of the British Association Unit (B.A.U.), formerly supposed to represent the true ohm. The real value of the B.A.U. is now taken as Β·9866 of an international ohm.
Table III.βElectric Volume-Resistivity of Various Metals at 0Β° C.,
or Resistance per Centimetre-cube at 0Β° C. in C.G.S. Units.
(Fleming and Dewar, Phil. Mag., September 1893.)
| Metal. | Resistance at 0Β° C. per Centimetre-cube in C.G.S. Units. |
Mean Temperature Coefficient between 0Β° C. and 100Β° C. |
| Silver (electrolytic and well annealed)[6] | 1,468ββ | ββ0Β·00400 |
| Copper (electrolytic and well annealed)[6] | 1,561ββ | ββ0Β·00428 |
| Gold (annealed) | 2,197ββ | ββ0Β·00377 |
| Aluminium (annealed) | 2,665ββ | ββ0Β·00435 |
| Magnesium (pressed) | 4,355ββ | ββ0Β·00381 |
| Zinc | 5,751ββ | ββ0Β·00406 |
| Nickel (electrolytic)[6] | 6,935ββ | ββ0Β·00618 |
| Iron (annealed) | 9,065ββ | ββ0Β·00625 |
| Cadmium | 10,023ββ | ββ0Β·00419 |
| Palladium | 10,219ββ | ββ0Β·00354 |
| Platinum (annealed) | 10,917ββ | ββ0Β·003669 |
| Tin (pressed) | 13,048ββ | ββ0Β·00440 |
| Thallium (pressed) | 17,633ββ | ββ0Β·00398 |
| Lead (pressed) | 20,380ββ | ββ0Β·00411 |
| Bismuth (electrolytic)[7] | 110,000ββ | ββ0Β·00433 |
- β 1.0 1.1 The values for nickel and bismuth given in the table are much higher than later values obtained with pure electrolytic nickel and bismuth.
- β The value here given, namely 12Β·885, for the electric mass-resistivity of liquid mercury as determined by Matthiessen is now known to be too high by nearly 1%. The value at present accepted is 12Β·789 ohms per metre-gramme at 0Β° C.
- β The value (1630) here given for hard-drawn copper is about β 1/4β % higher than the value now adopted, namely, 1626. The difference is due to the fact that either Jenkin or Matthiessen did not employ precisely the value at present employed for the density of hard-drawn and annealed copper in calculating the volume-resistivities from the mass-resistivities.
- β Matthiessenβs value for nickel is much greater than that obtained in more recent researches. (See Matthiessen and Vogt, Phil. Trans., 1863, and J. A. Fleming, Proc. Roy. Soc., December 1899.)
- β Matthiessenβs value for mercury is nearly 1% greater than the value adopted at present as the mean of the best results, namely 94,070.
- β 6.0 6.1 6.2 The samples of silver, copper and nickel employed for these tests were prepared electrolytically by Sir J. W. Swan, and were exceedingly pure and soft. The value for volume-resistivity of nickel as given in the above table (from experiments by J. A. Fleming, Proc. Roy. Soc., December 1899) is much less (nearly 40%) than the value given by Matthiessenβs researches.
- β The electrolytic bismuth here used was prepared by Hartmann and Braun, and the resistivity taken by J. A. Fleming. The value is nearly 20% less than that given by Matthiessen.