Page:Constitutional imperialism in Japan (IA constitutionalim00clemrich).pdf/41

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
No. 3]
The Imperial Diet
31

Saionji continuing as Premier and the Seiyukai as the strongest party in the House of Representatives, passed off quietly.

The twenty-fifth session illustrated what Uyehara[1] calls “one of the anomalies of Japanese domestic politics.” The Seiyukai, in a majority in the House of Representatives, supported the non-party Katsura Cabinet, which had been organized when Saionji, for some unaccountable reason, resigned. It would seem that, as Uyehara suggests,[2] the Seiyukai had no other course, except to run the risk of a dissolution and the loss of their majority in an expensive election.

The twenty-sixth and the twenty-seventh sessions continued this anomaly, which Katsura called a “Rapprochement Policy.” But the Seiyukai were enabled during these sessions to obtain from Katsura some concessions in return for their support. For instance, the Government was compelled to agree to a slight reduction of the land-tax, a reassessment of the taxable value of land, a revised tariff, etc. Moreover, attention must be called to the budget for 1909–1910. The Japan Mail said:

It may be described broadly as the first really sound document of its kind which a Japanese Cabinet has been in a position to compile for some years, since it brings expenditures strictly within the limits of visible income and since it makes no draft upon contingent assets.

When the twenty-eighth session met, it found Saionji again at the post of Premier, with the Seiyukai in a majority in the House of Representatives, so that everything passed off smoothly.

The twenty-ninth session was a special one, necessitated by the death of the Emperor Mutsuhito, and was marked by perfect unanimity.

The thirtieth session was a stormy one from the very outset. The Saionji Cabinet had been wrecked by the demand of the War Minister (Gen. Uyehara) for an increase of the

  1. Op. cit., p. 253.
  2. Ibid., p. 254.

(351)