Page:Archives of dermatology (IA archivesofdermat1187unse).pdf/8
j LEWIS SMITH/.
2
an entirely new disease with Those who think us.
occasionally seen isolated cases of it
that they have
previously to the recent epi-
demic, evidently refer to roseola.
This epidemic of rotheln commenced in close of 1873, April, 1874,
and attained
when
The
out May.
maximum
near the
prevalence in March and
declined, occasional cases occurring through-
it
first
its
New York
case which I observed occurred in the middle
New
of December, in Seventy-first street, being in the suburbs of
A
York, on the north.
few weeks
later,
cases were so
numerous
in
the thickly settled portions of the city as to attract the attention
many
of
physicians.
It
was evident that a disease had appeared
with which we were not familiar, and as the eruption occurred in points, or small circumscribed patches,
was, I think, usually
it
designated by the physician, in want of a more accurate name,
Those
epidemic roseola, or was spoken of as a spurious measles. physicians the
who were
familiar with foreign medical literature
saw
resemblance between these cases and those of rotheln as
described by British and continental observers, but in certain at least of the foreign cases the duration of the rash
seven days (Liveing, Lancet, March
and Library, May,
But
the fourth day.
to
be
and Medical News
1874), whereas in the cases in
commonly disappeared by was not
14, 1874,
was said
New York
it
discrepancy
this
sufficient to invalidate the belief in the identity of the
New York
disease
with the
foreign
rotheln.
It
was
readily
explained by the difference in the seasons in which the cases occurred, for Liveing observed his cases in June and July, and the greater the external heat the longer the duration of the eruption, as
we
will see.
Between the middle of December and the
first
of
May
observed and treated this malady in eighteen families.
I
had
Cases
occurred in three other families living in the same houses with
some of those which
I attended,
and
as they
were
fully
and
clearly
described to me, so that there could be no doubt as to their nature, I have included
them
in
were observed in the twenty-one
my
statistics.
families.
Forty-eight cases
During May, when the