Page:An introduction to philosophy (IA Introductiontoph00brig 0).pdf/10

introductory treatment of the text may then be supplemented by extensive outside readings selected from the bibliography or from other sources.
The author expects and desires criticism, not only “constructive” but also “destructive.” Much of this criticism will doubtless be deserved. The author is under no illusion of infallibility. It is, however, to be feared that some of the criticism will arise from the fact that personalism happens not to be in fashion at the moment. There are critics who will welcome any philosophy, no matter how extravagant, provided it does not eventuate in theism; and will reject, without careful examination, any philosophy, no matter how reasonable, if it be inclined to find some truth in religion. Other critics have a similar animus against anything that calls itself idealism. Matters have come to such a pass that the idealism of Plato finds entrance into philosophically élite circles only when called realism. Some contemporary idealists seek refuge under other banners, such as “spiritualistic pluralism” or “personal realism.” Names mean little, fashions even less. Only the truth counts. Not label or fad, but rational thought is the sole arbiter of truth recognized by philosophy. If this book leads its readers to examine current fashions of opinion with calm, coherent thought, it will have accomplished an important part of its mission.
It would be a delightful task, but impossible, to thank all who have encouraged and helped the author in writing the book. The list of such would include former teachers, colleagues at Boston University and other institutions, students, stenographers, and others. Special thanks are due to Professor Mary W. Calkins and Professor Albert C. Knudson for suggestions based on a reading of the manuscript as