Page:A History of Mediaeval Jewish Philosophy.djvu/330
difference in speed of the motions of the various spheres is that it is
due to their relative proximity to the outer sphere, which is the cause
of this motion and which it communicates to all the other spheres
under it. But his reasons are inadequate, for some of the swift mov-
ing spheres are below the slow moving and some are above. When he
says that the reason the sphere of the fixed stars moves so slowly
from west to east is because it is so near to the diurnal sphere (the
outer sphere), which moves from east to west, his explanation is
wonderfully clever. 283 But when he infers from this that the farther
a sphere is from the fixed stars the more rapid is its motion from west
to east, his conclusion is not true to fact. Or let us consider the exist-
ence of the stars in the spheres. The matter of the stars must be differ-
ent from that of the spheres, for the latter move, whereas the stars are
always stationary. Now what has put these two different matters
together? Stranger still is the existence and distribution of the fixed
stars in the eighth sphere. Some parts are thickly studded with stars,
others are very thin. In the planentary spheres what is the reason
(since the sphere is simple and uniform throughout) that the star
occupies the particular place that it does? This can scarcely be a
matter of necessity. It will not do to say that the differences in
the motions of the spheres are due to the separate Intelligences for
which the respective spheres have a desire. For the Intelligences
are not bodies, and hence do not occupy any position relative to
the spheres. There must therefore be a being who determines their
various motions.
Further, it is argued on the philosophical side that from a simple cause only a simple effect can follow; and that if the cause is composite, as many effects will follow as there are simple elements in the cause. Hence from God directly can come only one simple Intelligence. This first Intelligence produces the second, the second produces the third, and so on (cf. above, p. 178). Now according to this idea, no matter how many Intelligences are produced in this successive manner, the last, even if he be the thousandth, would have to be simple. Where then does composition arise? Even if we grant that the farther the Intelligences are removed from the first cause the more composite they become by reason of the composite nature of their ideas or thoughts, how can we explain the emanation of a sphere from an Intelligence,